I get it that parentsâ rights sound like a good thing. In the words of the movementâs leaders, itâs about the âliberty of parents to direct a childâs upbringing, education, and care as a fundamental right.â Thatâs nice, right? In theory, perhaps, but in practice, itâs a big no. The parentsâ rights movement is problematic for quite a few reasons. Let me lay it out for you.
It allows a small group of vocal parents to make decisions that affect other peopleâs children.
I donât have an issue with people making decisions for their own children. You pay your kids to do chores? I donât care. You want to raise your kids in a particular religion? Your business. But when your decisions start to affect my kids, then we have a problem. I understand that there are books that some parents are uncomfortable with their children reading or lessons that for whatever reason they donât want their kids participating in. I donât agree with that kind of censorship, but thatâs their prerogative. It is not, however, within those individualsâ rights to make the decision about what is and is not appropriate for other peopleâs children.
The argument is that parents are the experts on their own kids. I can get on board with that in most cases, but the loudest folks in this debate are not experts in education and I donât want them making decisions that affect a class, school, district, or state full of children. If the teachers and librarians have determined that a book or lesson belongs in their classroom, I trust that decision. And in the rare case that I donât, I can pull my child. I just shouldnât be able to make that call for anyone else. And neither should you.
It means a single complaint can lead to the removal of a book, lesson, or entire curriculum.
Thereâs a long history of book bans and parents objecting to things taught in school, but in general, thereâs been a thorough review process. Now, we have parents who feel emboldened, and it takes much less than it once did to get something removed. For example, in Florida, two parents challenged Disneyâs Ruby Bridges, a film about the Civil Rights activist and one of the first Black children to integrate schools in the South. The grounds? It teaches how âwhite people hate black people.â A temporary ban went into effect while the school engaged in the formal objection process.
These days it doesnât even take a complaint because we now have folks self-censoring. Teachers may be less likely to teach certain topics or read books because theyâre worried about parent complaints. (I know I stopped teaching about the Day of the Dead because I got tired of being accused of being a devil worshipper. Yep.). Districts are revisiting their content (and thatâs how you get a Carroll Independent School District ban of a book written by a Black author for whom one if its middle schools is named). But itâs also publishers like Scholastic engaging in what Iâll call âproactive censorship.â And those decisions have a far greater impact than a single classroom, school, or district.
It has parents of transgender children asking, âWhat about my rights?â
In an opinion piece for the Tallahassee Democrat, Florida mom Jennifer Koslow responds to recent anti-trans legislation in the state, writing, âI am the parent of a transgender child. I should have the fundamental right to determine what is in the best interests of my childâs health and education. These legislations that would ban gender-affirming medical care for minors ⊠undermine my parental authority ⊠[They] undermine a parentâs fundamental right to make medical decisions for their child in consultation with their physicians.â
Should parentsâ rights not also extend to advocacy for a safe educational environment for oneâs children? I spoke to Texas parent and advocate for transgender youth, Rachel Gonzales, and her Arizona counterpart, Lizette Trujillo. They told me, âUnfortunately, parentsâ rights have been weaponized by extremists to disrupt school spaces and hinder the progress that has been made in the last decades ensuring the safety of all students and especially LGBTQ+ students. We know that learning is severely inhibited when students do not feel safe, so this deeply impacts the ability for some students to learn in the way all students should be able to.â
It ignores the rights of parents who want something different.
In an essay for The New York Times, Jamelle Bouie writes, âThe reality of the âparentsâ rightsâ movement is that it is meant to empower a conservative and reactionary minority of parents to dictate education and curriculums to the rest of the community. âParentsâ rights,â in other words, is when some parents have the right to dominate all the others.â Gonzales and Trujillo told me, âExtreme groups see parental rights as a way to enforce a very specific religious ideology, while enforcing curriculum and book bans that inhibit inclusion and safety in the classroom of diverse or marginalized students.â
Believe me, there are plenty of parents who want their children to learn about LGBTQ+ identities and history, to grapple with the legacy of slavery and the enduring and systemic role of racism in the country, and to have access to books with diverse perspectives. We know the power of representation, of windows, mirrors, and sliding glass doors. What about our rights? If exercising your rights means fewer rights for others, youâre doing it wrong. Period.